by
The People’s Redemption Party, PRP, has blasted the Presidency’s move to buy new luxury jets for President Bola Ahmed Tinubu.
The PRP, in a statement on Monday by its Acting National Publicity Secretary, Muhammed Ishaq, criticized the government for prioritizing the President’s comfort over the welfare of Nigerians, who are struggling with economic hardship and poverty.
It described the move as reckless, insensitive, and a clear testament to the government’s detachment from reality.
Recall that the Presidency had previously stated that the new jets are intended to enhance the President’s security and comfort during official trips.
However, the purchase has continued to spark outrage among many Nigerians, who view it as an unnecessary expense and a sign of the government’s disconnect from the people.
Given the country’s current economic situation, the party quizzed the rationale behind the purchase and accused the government of being out of touch with the realities faced by ordinary citizens.
The PRP equally said that the Presidential jet bought in 2003 is only 19 years old, asking why the government is not learning from examples of other countries like China and the US, which have used their presidential jets for 24 and 34 years respectively.
The PRP demanded that the government reconsider this wasteful expenditure and focus on delivering tangible benefits to the Nigerian people.
The party further urged all well-meaning Nigerians to join them in condemning this reckless spending spree and demanding better governance from their leaders.
PRP said, “The government’s decision to purchase new aeroplanes for the Presidential fleet is a clear testament to their detachment from reality and lack of empathy and accountability.
“They are prioritizing luxury spending over the welfare of the people, despite the country’s crippling economic woes and citizens struggling to make ends meet.
“It is unconscionable that the government is indulging in lavish spending sprees when the economy is in ruins, inflation rates are inching towards 40%, and workers’ wages have not been reviewed.
“They should focus on addressing the pressing issues of poverty, unemployment, and economic stagnation.”
